Most Dangerous Game Free Essays

Suspense of in â€Å"The Most Dangerous Game† Suspense is when the reader anxiously want to know more but the author waits to give them further information. In â€Å"The Most Dangerous Game†, by Richard Connell, suspense is used in many situations. A big-game hunter named Rainsford, who is from New York, falls aboard and swims to the island. We will write a custom essay sample on Most Dangerous Game or any similar topic only for you Order Now He gets trapped on the island of a sadistic fellow hunter General Zaroff, who bored with conventional prey, has come to see humans as the only quarry worthy of his skill, hunting man. Plays his hunting games with Rainsford. Connell creates suspense through grammar, cliffhangers and holding the resolution until the last sentence. Richard Connell uses grammar to create suspense. For Rainsford, when he was in the water had no other choice than to follow the gunshots he had heard, which bought him to the mansion of General Zaroff. While discussing about the dangerous animal on island, Rainsford asked if it was tiger, the General gives him clues about what animal it was. At the point when Rainsford understand the games being played on the island, he says, â€Å"‘But you can’t mean – ‘ gasped Rainsford†(21). The author uses grammar to create suspense at this situation because he restricts the reader from knowing what Rainsford knows for which he uses hyphen. Finally Rainsford says, ‘†Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder†Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ(21). Then the reader understands the animal Zaroff hunts is man. This time Connell uses cliffhangers to create suspense. When the game was being played between Rainsford and the General, the General brought Ivan and his dogs to look for Rainsford. Rainsford thought of a native trick he learned in Uganda. He uses the trick and starts running again, after a while he thought to climb up a tree to see the result of his trick. Rainsford panicked and saw a blue gap between the trees. The author mentions, â€Å"Then he leaped far out into the sea. . . . â€Å"(30). Rainsford got into the sea but the author uses cliffhanger for his suspense this time. He ends the section without providing further information to the anxious readers. Instead of continuing the plot he goes on to talk about General Zaroff restricting the readers from the knowing what Rainsford did and where he went. Connell holds the resolution till the end of the story to create suspense. The most important part the reader looks for is ‘what happens in the end? ‘. When General was approaching his mansion, Rainsford wishes him luck for next time standing up in the balcony of the mansion. The general appreciates him for his way of getting up there and tells him that he has to repay for his dog. But then the author writes, † He had never slept in a better bed decided, Rainsford†(30). The author finally ends the suspense here. It takes until the last sentence of the story to have any resolution. Richard Connell uses grammar, cliffhanger and hold the resolution till the end of the story to create suspense at certain points. First, the author makes the reader wait to know about the animal being hunted on island by using hyphens to create suspense. Then, he ends a section without providing further information of what Rainsford is doing and where did he go. Finally, he ends the story without letting know the anxious readers about what happens to Rainsford. This was a suspenseful story. It provides us knowledge about how suspense can be used in different styles. How to cite Most Dangerous Game, Essay examples Most Dangerous Game Free Essays The Most Dangerous Game† are examples of foil characters with two very different personlaties as well as characteristics. These two characters are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Zaroff is the hunter and Rainsford is the prey in this story. We will write a custom essay sample on Most Dangerous Game or any similar topic only for you Order Now Also, General Zaroff has very unethical ideas and hobbies. This is very different from Rainsford’s humane beliefs. Lastly, Zaroff is far more ostentatious compared to Rainsford, who is more resourceful with his hunting experience. It is clear that their character traits differ greatly. To begin, Zaroff and Rainsford have two very different roles in â€Å"The Most Dangerous Game†. General Zaroff is perceived as the hunter and Rainsford is the prey. Zaroff presents a â€Å"game† where the two characters hunt each other. Although Rainsford wins this â€Å"game†, Zaroff is known as the hunter. This is because he is known for hunting humans. He has also never lost this â€Å"game† to any of his other opponents. Rainsford is seen as the prey (prior to him winning) because he is against hunting humans and considers it murder. He also appears to be afraid of Zaroff in he beginning. † I wish to leave this island at once† (Connel 175). This represents his fear. Knowing this, it is automatically assumed that Zaroff will hunt and kill Rainsford. To continue, the two characters are considered foils because they have different beliefs and morals. General Zaroff is open about his hobby of hunting humans. He even ridicules Rainsford by saying that he â€Å"harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life† (Connel 172). On the other hand, Rainsford’s character hunts animals. He considers it murder to hunt human beings. Zaroffs reason for hunting humans is hat they are able to reason with the hunter, therefore making it more of a challenge to hunt them. One possible reason for this difference of morals are the nationality of the two men. General Zaroff is Russian while Rainsford is American. This could explain the difference because the culture and lifestyle of the two countries could cause its citizens to act in certain ways. Additionally, Zaroff and Rainsford are foil characters because of their behavior and character. In the story General Zaroff is ostentatious while Rainsford is more resourceful. Zaroff shows off his home and lifestyle when Rainsford is there. He also appears bossy in the story. He orders around Ivan and seems to brag about the people he is training in his basement. This might also be a reason that Zaroff loses the â€Å"game†. â€Å"‘To date I have not lost,’ he said† (Connel 174). He underestimates Rainsford’s abilities and is too confident about himself. He is sure that he will win the game. Rainsford is considered resourceful because he uses features of the forest to build traps for Zaroff and his dogs multiple times in the story. He also uses his Knowledge 0T nuntlng to create a trall tnats OITTlcult to Tollow Dy Laron. RalnsTora relies on his talents while Zaroff seems to rely on other sources such as the hounds. In conclusion, General Zaroff and Rainsford represent foil characters in â€Å"The Most Dangerous Game†. They are two extremely different people with different beliefs and traits. Zaroffs character is an amoral one who likes to hunt humans. His character is also depicted as the showy and arrogant hunter. Rainsford on the other hand is ethical compared to Zaroff. He is also seen as the prey of the story. General Zaroff and Rainsford are very obvious examples of foil characters. How to cite Most Dangerous Game, Papers